The
Lady of Little Death
Illuminated
Encounters and Erotic Duties in the Life and Art of Maria Beatty
by
Katrien Jacobs
"You
are dreaming," she cried. "Wake up!" She grasped my arm
with her marble hand. "Wake up" she repeated, this time
in a low, gruff voice. --von Sacher-Masoch
Pain
is as capable, perhaps more so, of inscribing bodies as pleasure.
--Elizabeth Grosz
The
Nostalgic Habitat: Versailles
You
may enter this space not finding anything in particular to remind you
of the sex act: no unmade beds, no posing bodies, no pastel lights. You
have taken a dark elevator and walked into the gracious decor of one of
New York Citys most refined s/m houses. You encounter blue velvet-covered
walls which open and close like sliding doors and regulate an ongoing
traffic of clients who want to visit the different rooms: the dungeon,
the medical room, the classroom, Times Square, the virtual reality room,
and Versailles. This last one is an ostentatious anteroom for visitors
who want to initiate theater pieces in faux aristocratic environments
furnished with fireplaces, marble statues, gilt frames, and brocaded thrones.
Versailles casts an illusion of tactile organization and orderliness in
the heart of a congested metropolis. To the uninformed outsider, the stage
setup of Versailles evokes the stifling code of conduct of the upper-class.
To the s/m practitioner, however, this master-servant space houses a protocol
of subterfuge and erotic cruelty. Looking at the variety of performances
and fantasies enacted in Versailles (and its hidden dungeons) "sadomasochism"
becomes a polymorphous body of sex acts which deviate from straight, genital-oriented,
plotless intercourse --spanking, gagging, body piercing, urinating, infantilism,
cross-dressing. The dominant and submissive partners engage in role-play
and transform the bedroom ritual into a "holistic" event which
purposefully moderates, and artfully interrupts, the goal of sexual intercourse
and/or reproduction.
"Versailles,"
as a setting for treacherous upper class rituals and status symbols, provides
the framework for the early pornographic film art of Maria Beatty. (FIG.1)
As a literary reference and ideological statement, Beattys work
pays tribute to Jean Genet and his play The Balcony (1958) which
anticipated the s/m subcultures growing desire to shatter myths
of paternal authority. In the play, "staged" types of eroticism become
the equivalent of a symbolic castration. The satirical and erotic evocation
of authority figures such as the Judge, the Bishop, the General, and the
Police, are juxtaposed with the "egalitarian" views of a political revolutionary,
Roger, who represents,"the real world outside." In the final scene of
the play, at the height of a Paris revolution, Roger undergoes an identity
crisis and goes to the s/m house to (clumsily) act out a Chief of Police
in the vicinity of an obeying "slave." Roger then castrates himself in
a paradoxical attempt to impersonate and annihilate his desire for power.
Roger is thrown out of the s/m house by the proprietress, Madame Irma,
who disdains his lack of performative rigor and his lunatic gesture of
self-mutilation which also stains her new carpets.
Genets
anarchic/fatalistic scenario presents Rogers tragedy as the dramatic
epiphany of a wavering modern psyche. A new dimensionality in Rogers
identity emerges through his simultaneous impersonation and castration
of authority. As Roger is forced to shape and grow into the world of gendered
performance and state institutions, sexual and revolution ary activity
can only be obtained through erotic and regressive reversals of identity.
Genet thus presents castration as tantamount to a rejection of an oppressive,
genital-oriented culture and an affirmation of childhoods sexually
undifferentiated state.
Recasting
Genets master/servant narrative, Beattys trompe l'oeil scenery further explodes gender binaries and moves art inside the frame
of screen pornography and radical sex politics. Beattys debut film The Elegant Spanking (1995) portrays a childhood memory
and longing for mother-daughter gratification. The film uses a classical
spanking setting of s/m pornography, and builds towards the gradual display
of naked buttocks, meticulous spankings carried out by a ladys hand,
and sexual climax. Punishment and spanking refer back to childhood, yet
are acted out as a gentle lesbian perversity. Beatty dresses up as a French
maid 'Kitty' and stages an illuminated encounter with her
aristocratic mistress/girlfriend --Goddess Rosemary (Rosemary Delain).(FIG.2)
Kitty is a little, naughty woman who desires to be touched by the maternal
mistress and fantasizes contact with her bodily fluids: "To sip from
her tea-cup. To Lick her feet. To drink her urine.
To
taste the dirt from her water of life. 'Kittys' eyes are those dark-edged
eyes of the silent movies. They slowly pace the movie and beg for the
silent action to take place. The viewer becomes part of what she sees:
the physical contours of a stern mistress who is narcissistic and punishes
her for showing signs of jealousy. The little woman, submissive in the
s/m scenario, functions as a voyeur and Magister Ludi or unseen
director of the film action. Beatty develops a classical, stylized mis-en-scene
which follows 'Kittys' point of view shot --i.e. her gaze which
contemplates old-fashioned china and roses, spiked heels and suspender
corsets, and fetishistic genital shots. Once Kitty gets punished, and
her bare buttocks (rather than her eyes) become the focal point of the
movie, The Elegant Spanking starts revealing its pornographic intent
to the viewer. It takes the viewer on a climactic ride in experiencing
fetishism and foot worship, mutual masturbation, spanking scenes, and
a golden shower.
In
a daringly explored tension between classical film composition and assertive
bodily display, The Elegant Spanking offers a new contribution
to lesbian s/m porn. A romantic-nostalgic filmmaker, Beatty pays tribute
to the stage setup of Versailles, yet she also forces the film to gradually
unfold its illusionistic cachet. The Elegant Spanking thus develops
from a crisply proceeding dialectic between nostalgic and factual s/m
desire. Nostalgic desire frames the scripted and fictionalized narrative
of the past; while the unscripted and unspoken narrative reveals a unique
relationship and physical desire between Beatty and Delain.
The
stylized acting makes reference to older experiments in film art such
as the surrealist film, while the lesbian imagery recalls a history of
pornographic cinematic imagination. Beattys well crafted "butt"
compositions in particular, hearken back to underground pornography and
the birth of audio-visual technology in the 19th century. A catalog of
Nazarieff's collection Jeux de Dames Cruelles Photographies 1850-1960 (1992) shows lesbian spanking scenes which have been integral to the institution
of photography since the mid-19th century. Most pictures zoom in on the
naked, submissive "girlish" butt cheeks as fetishized body parts. The
two glaring cheeks surrounded by black stockings and white lace petticoats
are an expressionistic black and white contrast which features strongly
in The Elegant Spanking. The classroom punishment and mistress-maid
scenes, staged by male photographers for male pleasure, mostly depict
the dominatrix participant as an older, uptight woman; while the submissive
is a young and beautiful "little" woman. The age contrast between the
two participants reaffirms the mimetic character of the punishment scenes
and hides their pornographic intent. As we browse through Nazarieff's
collection and enter the more recent photographs, we see a break-down
of mimetic illusionism and the emergence of desire in the dominant and submissive partners--facial expressions of laughter, a joyful surrender
to the photographers fantasy. (FIG.3,4,9)
As
new lesbian porn, The Elegant Spanking radically rewrites the traditional
contract between male producer and female actress. Beattys nostalgic
gaze revisits the old-day punishment scenes, yet it also shows how
mistress and maid can collaborate delicately in reaching intimate physical
contact, mutual satisfaction and orgasm. Beatty reorganizes age divisions
and encourages young women to receive and produce pleasure within the
s/m industry. Rosemary Delain appropriates the royal throne of Versailles
in order to implement a punishment fantasy which provides pleasure and
desire in both the dominant and submissive partners. In its most humorous
aspect, The Elegant Spanking illustrates how the spanking narrative
can be hijacked and appropriated by young women who want to court their
partners and make kinky sex portraits.
How
can we zoom closer into such artful "little death" scenes conceived by
two women at the fringes of the porn industry? Whereas sexual flagellation
has for centuries been recognized by the industries of sex, medicine,
and pornography, as a healthy instrument of erotic stimulation, its healing
aspects have been mostly reserved for men. In the 17th century, German
doctor Johan Heinrich Meibaum (1590-1655) wrote the first in a series
of influential treatises about the medical benefits of sexual flagellation,
indicating that it cured the adult male subject of madness, melancholy
caused by unhappy love, erotic mania, skinniness, bodily weakness, but
above all impotence. (FIG.5) This idea became institutionalized in the
prostitution house, were male patients would be sent out to be spanked
or "cured" by a female dominant. Ian Gibson's study The English
Vice: Beating, Sex, Shame in Victorian England and After further documents
spanking stories which featured regularly in the British newspapers as
a form of hidden pornography. Needless to say that women, often portrayed
as dominant characters within the fantasies, were actually discouraged
from advertising erotic fantasies in newspapers or public s/m houses.
Female spanking perverts were still mostly a male invention. Take for
instance John Clelands porn classic Memoirs of Fanny Hill (1749)
which narrates a challenging encounter between Fanny and the young, impotent
Mr.Barville. Cleland details the whipping session and conveys how Fanny
herself gets pleasantly aroused. After mutual spanking and a nice dinner
with Mr. Barville, Fanny is suddenly overcome by "itching ardors"
and "a prickly heat" which makes her shift and wriggle in her seat.
Finally, Mr.Barville helps her get full satisfaction by means of spanking
and intercourse. Published in the 1920s in Victorian England, Havelock
Ellis's case-study "Florrie," narrated the life of a suffragette who pursued
feminism in public life and begged for chastisement and confinement in
private life. Ellis as an early psycho-analyst taught Florrie how to accept
her fantasies and gradually encouraged her to have her first orgasm through
flaggelation. A fully self-authored and persistent spanking fanatic was
Edith Cadivec who wrote her memoirs in Confessions and Experiences and Eros,the Meaning of My Life (1920-1924). Cadivec gave an explicit
account of her masochism and explained it as a cry for the intense physical
touch and affection of her mother who passed away when she was nine years
old.
In
order to understand the female "submissive" personae from Cadivec to Beatty;
we have to remember that women pornographers have been thoroughly misapprehended
and censored by print and non-print publishers. How can we even start
to unfold the motives behind their cautiously hidden or blatantly maimed
narratives? Pornography as a legal term denoting selected and censored
publications emerged "...in the context of the careful regulation of the
consumption of the obscene so as to exclude the lower classes and women." In her study The Invention of Pornography, Lynn Hunt argues
that pornography has since its emergence had a paradoxical relationship
to democracy. It was "invented" in modernity (1500-1800) in response to
the perceived menace of the democratization of culture through forms of
mass communication. To the present day, it has been a challenge for women
and other minorities to become directors and critics of pornography, and/or
public agents of sexual pleasure. Although the institution of s/m has
become more available to women in straight and lesbian relationships,
the female submissive persona has been scarcely analyzed and touched upon
by critics and theorists of pornography.
Analyzing
Beatty's s/m pornography means penetrating a complex interplay between
staged submission and affluent desire, between postponed and actualized
varieties of "little death." Art and reality are inescapably intertwined
in her work environment, and the films function as a visual diary to her
sexual development. When she started to produce The Elegant Spanking in 1994, Beatty had only barely developed her submissive alter ego and
she cleverly used film technology to formulate the new identity. Her "fame"
in the New York video art scene was growing at a steady pace, yet her
s/m love relationships were fresh and sparkling. Although The Elegant
Spanking grew out of a collaboration between Beatty and Delain, Beatty
was in charge of most aesthetic aspects of the film making process, imposing
composition and editing styles onto the spanking narrative. Once The
Elegant Spanking was launched into the New York s/m scene and gay
and lesbian film festival circuits, it caused exaltation, raving successes
and emotional turbulence in the life of the producers.
During
the premiere screening of The Elegant Spanking at the University
of Maryland at College Park (March 1994, spanking and mutual masturbation
scenes were screened and acted out in front of a startled audience.
Posters and flyers were distributed all over the universitys campus
to announce the "coming" of Maria Beatty & Rosemary Detain. The s/m
couple was featured to show film clips and perform a live s/m session
on an antique chair. The antique chair was placed inside a university
aula and was meant to (humorously) destabilize quotidian power dynamics
between professors and students. Just like the "Versailles" environment
of The elegant Spanking, the chair functioned as a subversive
nostalgic object from which the law of the university could be challenged
and eroticized. The posters for the event showed a photograph
of Beatty/Kitty kneeling down to caress and worship the feet of her mistress.
Still-photographs from Beatty's production Sluts/Goddesses. How To
Be a Sex Goddess in 101 Easy Steps (1993) depicted porn stars such
as Annie Sprinkle, Scarlet Harlot, and others showing their leather-strapped
behinds and dancing in bare-breasted rituals. In the lower left corner
of the poster the audience was invited to "come on down and join the transformation
facilitators in their quest for ecstasy and humor and their abrupt intrusion
into the narrow American mind." Unfortunately, several days before Beatty
and Delain arrived at the University of Maryland, all "Sex, Truth &
Videotapes" posters had been torn from public walls, doors and bulletin
boards. The poster design had caused a big stir on campus, offended conservative,
homophobic and anti-porn activists, and lured a large number of students
into attending the show.(FIG.6)
Regardless of the havoc in a conservative heartland, Beatty and Delain
performed their session and entertained the crowd with their passionate
consensual role-play and porn activism. Although they showed signs of
erotic stimulation and sexual climax throughout the performance, they
were scarcely able to break out of their roles after the session had ended.
The question-and-answer session and interviews which followed the event
were unilaterally dominated by the mistress. Beatty was punished and pushed
next to the chair with a tug of Delains leash, and did not get much
of an opportunity to explain her motives for directing this lesbian s/m
film. Delains charismatic appearance and discourse complemented
her one-sided stock character in the film, yet she also obliterated Beattys
contribution to the event. However, in order to analyze Beattys
silent revenge and subterfuge within the s/m mimetic film text,
we have to further outline the agency of her gaze and how it sets the
parameters for demonstrative dominatrix behavior.
From Elegant to Cold Masochism
In
her most recent film The Black Glove (1996), Beatty documents a
more fictional, less "life-style" and experimental collaboration between
s/m practitioners. Beatty moves her persona inside a secluded space and
writes a solipsistic narrative which leads to the torture of the breasts
and vagina. The film opens with a stylized slow motion sequence showing
lady-like stiletto heels tapping into a polished floor. Beatty, tied up
from head to heel, is then delivered to the executioners room inside
a soft velvet wrapping. The psychological fantasy realm of The
Black Glove still resembles The Elegant Spanking: Beattys
infantile longing for maternal touch is translated and aestheticized into
consensual lesbian role-play. A young, helpless victim in disguise; Beattys
soft and infantile body craves to be violently matured by the mistress's
masquerade. However, the film soon shifts from a fetishistic shot revealing
the mistress to the representations of the victim's internalized gaze.
The two central mistresses in The Black Glove, Morgana and TV (transvestite)
Sabrina, are figments of Beatty's imagination. There are no more signs
of intimacy or human contact between the dominant and submissive partners.
Morgana looks like a cold and distant 'Pierrot' character and is an agent
removed from stage developments. Resembling Luis Bunuels surrealist
actors in Un Chien Andalou (1929), these technicians of erotic
cruelty embody the existentialist premise that they can only perceive
reality through the distorted lens of their consciousness. (FIG.7) Beattys
gaze in particular is no longer explicitly geared towards "the maternal
other," but brackets the other into the realm of private desires.
The bodily worship of The Elegant Spanking has been replaced by
a stainless steel fetish, a shining pinwheel and surgeons hemostats
which are slowly applied to Beattys body. Before she deprives herself
of all sensory perception by donning a black mask, black lace panties
(her own) are stuffed into her mouth. The camera then zooms into her vagina,
and her white labia are slowly pulled apart by means of shining instruments,
then to be covered with black candle wax. Towards the very end of the
film, a womans hand with black velvet glove enters the
picture and tempers the cruelty. This absent third player appears as a
shadow on the submissive's body, and her voice fills the soundtrack with
siren-like humming and orgasmic sounds. The contrast between soothing
nature sounds and imagery, and candid portrayals of bodily torture, is
crucial to Beatty's works. It is explained by the artist as an attempt
to show a painful state of bliss, or the bodily ecstasy (little death)
following sexual climax. (FIG.8)
In
order to trace Beattys development from nostalgic-romantic towards
masochistic artist, we have to consider Gilles Deleuzes study Masochism.
An Interpretation of Coldness and Cruelty (1971). Deleuze's analysis
of Von Sacher-Masoch's Venus in Furs can be applied to Beatty's
art to reveal the transition she makes from life-style art to the more
formal films. Following Freud in Beyond the Pleasure Principle,
Deleuze explains that masochism, death or destructive instincts are exhibited
in the unconscious in conjunction with life instincts. Destruction, and
the negative at work in destruction, always manifests itself as the other
face of construction and unification as governed by the pleasure-principle.
Deleuze believes that the "negative" in masochism strives towards a "positive"
outlet or "redeeming" cycle. Redemption is established through an intense
physical ordeal which intensifies sense-perceptions and transforms them
into distorted "formal" entities. In this respect, the masochistic gaze
envisions a de-humanized sexual experience, or at least explores the tension
between bodily sensations and the body as a representation. Deleuze concludes
that there is a fundamentally cruel aesthetic or plastic element
in masochism in its "freeze-framing" of aspects of reality.
Deleuze's
second important insight is that masochistic fantasies are quite different
from sadistic ones. Somehow, he considers masochistic fantasies to be
more refined (or more subject to his theory). Whereas sadist performers
act out the death instinct in demonstrative forms, by multiplying and
condensing cruelty; masochists use a more contemplative method. Deleuze
outlines how masochists use the gaze and contemplation to subvert law
and authority. Deleuze's distinction between masochism and sadism is useful
to understand Beatty's progress as an artist. As we have seen before, The Elegant Spanking subverts the law by featuring a young, lesbian
couple occupying the space of authority, by showing how punishment and
flagellation can nurture lesbian desire; and lastly, by showing a continuity
between between s/m mimesis and relationship dynamics. These three aspects
of subversion motivated the public appearance of Beatty and Delain at
the University of Maryland. Deleuze would believe that such demonstrative
subversions of the law are more typical of the sadist than the masochist.
Masochistic fantasies, as he writes, twist the law "...by excess of zeal.
By scrupulously applying the law we are able to demonstrate its absurdity
and provoke the very disorder that it is intended to prevent or conjure."
With The Black Glove, Beatty sinks deeper into the masochistic
model of subversion. First of all, the film features an exaggerated, and
slightly ridiculed, state of submission to fetishism, coldness, and cruelty.
The masochistic content is also portrayed as a state of mind rather than
a reality. The submissives "other" is no longer a living partner
but an abstract formal entity. While Beatty still entertains the mysterious
countenance of the mistresses, the film no longer confronts the presence,
the living women's aura and relationship pangs, as did The Elegant
Spanking.
Reading
the diaries of von Sacher-Masoch, Deleuze takes notice of the barons
austere sense perceptions, and how they infringe law and order upon the
living environment:
It
has been said that the senses become "theoreticians" and that the eye,
for example, becomes a human eye when its object itself has been transformed
into a human or cultural object, fashioned by and intended solely for
man. Animal nature is profoundly hurt when this transformation of its
organs from the animal to the human takes place, and it is this painful
process that the art of Masoch came to represent.
Before
Masoch pledges to surrender his life and luxury to the whims of a Russian
mistress, he reclines in a comfortable chair and exposes the senses as
"cruel theoreticians" to objects of the decadent environment. Masoch dissects
the environment and tries to give up the distinction between bodily sensations
and the art of fantasy. He calls this cultural state of transmuted sensualism,
"super-sensualism," and he finds in inanimate works of art the reflection
of his love for women who resemble cold, marble statues or paintings in
darkened rooms. Although Masoch falls in love eventually and expects to
be utterly mistreated by his mistress Wanda, he makes a first cruel leap between physical s/m personas and their disembodied reflections.
Through
a process of "disavowal" of living, organic aspects of sexuality;
masochists aestheticize physicality and create two-dimensional images
as fetishes. As Deleuze writes:
The
fetish is therefore not a symbol at all, but as it were a frozen, arrested,
two-dimensional image, a photograph to which one return repeatedly to
exorcise the dangerous consequences of movement, the harmful discoveries
that result from exploration.
Here
we can see the most powerful connection between Masoch and Beatty --the
gaze which initiates the process of performing painful sexuality and becomes
the ultimate incarnation of a "formal" aesthetic experience. (FIG.10)
Materially speaking, Masoch gives up his estate to become a servant, laborer,
and slave to Wandas court; only to be further mistreated, humiliated
and finally "dumped" by the Russian empress. Beatty accepts
public punishment from her mistress in a front of film audiences, and
uses a slave psychology to make fetishistic film portraits of the mistress's
body parts.
The
luring voice and soft fabric (black glove) of the absent woman play an
important role in The Black Glove, as Morgana and Sabrina apply
inanimate "cold" instruments to Beattys body --hemostats, and the
rubber mask. According to Deleuze, the coldness of masochistic art is
not the negation of feeling altogether, but the disavowal of sensuality.
Through disavowal, the sexual experience is turned into a state of "waiting"
and "suspense," representing a dormant fusion of the ideal and real in
the masochists fantasy. Waiting divides into two currents: "...the
first represents what is awaited, always late and always postponed, the
second something that is expected and on which depends the speeding up
of the awaited object." In the Black Glove, Beatty waits for
the absent woman to torture the vagina. There is a tension delicately
maintained between the cold, impersonal application of instruments by
Sabrina and Morgana, and the hot, searing pain of candlewax, the substitute
for sensuality, the reward following suspense.
Finally,
masochism is read by Deleuze as the desire to formally repeat and reconstruct
a regeneration rite. The deeper the process of desexualization, the more
powerful and extensive could be the process of resexualization. As we
have seen before, the latter upward movement is suggested in The Black
Glove by means of the soundtrack and the absent third player, whose
voice and softness recall an earth goddess or maternal type. She typifies
Beattys lost childhood and is idealized in the process of waiting,
as the other mistresses prepare her for her candlewax ritual. However,
Beatty's film do not clearly articulate the nature of her self-destruction
nor regeneration. Beattys body is literally tragic in that it wavers
between reality and film reflection. In its tendency to break apart the
imaginary gestalt of the ego, the body represent a return to the corps
morcele of prematurity and also encapsulates a Nietschean sense of
tragedy.
Whereas
Deleuze viewed the death drive as an inherently aesthetic and tragic faculty
of erotic sense perception, Jacques Lacan presents it as a formation of
the ego which was not unique to masochism itself. New Lacanian theorists
focus on the symbolic nature the death drive and contradict clinical psychologists
who consider s/m as a painful repetition of a traumatic experience. Lacan
views the subconscious as another form of reason, logic, and pleasure,
governed by signification rather than natural instincts. According to
Richard Boothby in Death and Desire. Psychoanalytic theory in Lacans
Return to Freud (1991), Lacan theorizes the death drive as a primordial
force of exclusion, a process of alienation which splits the subject from
itself and from the external world through language and symbols. In the
transition form libido to ego, imaginary gestalts (shapes) act
as a buffer or filter which refuses the transmission of energy. Following
Lacan, we can approach Beattys cinematography as the language of
the unconscious. Her masochistic and solipsistic dream imagery thus becomes
symbolic of the act of communication itself, narrating a process of separation
between parent and child and asserting the primacy of language in the
development of life/art. One could say that Beatty reaches conscious expression
only by means of disguise, distortion and displacement and she replaces
the original lost object of desire with a substitute. The substitute objects
in The Black Glove are the maternal glove and the black candle,
which is shaped like a phallus. Writing a language of fractured affection
and desire, Beatty continues to shape "femininity" within a history of
technology, psycho-analysis, and pornography.
What
Does S/M Teach Feminism?
How
can I further explain Beattys film art and how it entered the lives
and sensibilities of women like myself, and what about our relationship
to feminism? About five years ago, in her article "Daughter of the Movements:
The psychodynamics of Lesbian s/m fantasy," Julia Creet asked herself
the same question: whether or not lesbian s/m should be debated as a feminist
issue, and to what degree feminism had lost its credibility with s/m lesbians.
Creet, like myself, felt ambivalent about leading this discussion inside
the (already biased) academic institution. However, s/m had acquired a
certain appeal within the academic feminist context, so the new discourse
became almost inevitable. And vice versa, feminism had become a powerful
role-player within the economy of lesbian s/m fantasies. Creet concluded
her article saying that lesbian s/m had formed itself in the late 70s
as a subculture leading a twofold rebellion against dominating patriarchal
and matriarchal (feminist) modes of public culture. Lesbian s/m exploded
the restrictive measures of the symbolic father and two mothers:"a
biological mother (true, she probably does not want to hear about lesbian
sex); and a symbolic Mother who has come to be the repository of the prohibitions
of feminism ...feminism itself has become a source of approval or disapproval."
Witnessing
and analyzing Beattys radical shift from performance art to s/m
videos, I have myself often contemplated and experienced the status and
power of feminism. The question remains simple: Why is it that a discussion
of radical body art and sex work cannot be easily accommodated within
the postmodern feminist and gender discourses of art and academia? Why
is it that lesbian s/m cannot pass the judgment of patriarchal and liberal
thinkers? We need a new feminism, if one at all, which accomodates insurgent
sexual identities. In order to apply this statement to the case of Beatty,
let me first give a sketch of the artistic and political "feminist" movements
which informed her work. Beattys reputation as film producer and
director began with documentaries about performance art: the anthology Sphinxes Without Secrets: Women Performance Artists Speak Out (1991); The Sluts and Goddesses Video Workshop or How to Be A Sex Goddess in
101 Easy Steps (1992) in co-production with Annie Sprinkle; and Imaging
Her Erotics (1994) in co-production with Carolee Schneemann. It was
in the Fall of 1993 that Beatty first came out as an s/m performer and
sex worker. She had on several occasions interacted with the older artists
who had successfully turned their sex and body politics into "works of
art." Beattys struggle became to turn masochistic eroticism into
artistic property in the face of an "aging" performance art establishment.
The
performance art documentary Sphinxes Without Secrets was produced
in response to the NEA controversies over the national funding of sexually
explicit art. It brought together several performance artists such as
Lenora Champagne, Ellie Covan, Diamanda Galas, Holly Hughes, and Laurie
Anderson and intended to narrate a women's history of performance art
to counter-act restrictive legislation and censorship. Beatty was appointed
director of this gigantic project, which was made possible with major
grants from New York State Council on the Arts, Art Matters, Inc., and
DCTV. Beatty's interest in Sphinxes Without Secrets was to produce
(rather than debate) sexual politics and to participate in culture wars
against the American conservative climate. As producer and editor of Sphinxes
Without Secrets and other independent videos, Beatty slowly started
to turn the camera onto herself. She had her very first photo-shoot as
"feminist porn activist" for the porn magazine Adam in 1993. The
interview and photos were produced by Annie Sprinkle who (at that moment)
praised her work highly: "Personally I think Maria Beatty is the best
thing since Fellini, Jodorowsky and even Russ Meyer, and I'm lucky enough
to be working with her." Beatty explained her commitment to alternative
lesbian porn:
Mainstream
porn just has the home video market. I've targeted a whole other area
like festivals, galleries and universities ... I'm creating a whole
new kind of distribution network for sexually explicit stuff. Plus,
I have actually a whole new kind of freedom in terms of censorship.
Because it's "art" and has "socially redeeming value", that gives me
freedom to put all kinds of sex acts in my films that [mainstream] porn
isn't legally able to.
Both
Sprinkle and Beatty believed in the alternative distribution of lesbian
pornography. However, a break occurred between them after the making of Sluts/Goddesses over Beatty's growing interest in s/m. In Sluts/Goddesses,
Sprinkle and seven other "transformation facilitators" show a fantastic
gamut of lesbian sex games from ancient sacred spirituality to dirty language
and female ejaculation. The area of s/m role-play, however, did not get
ample coverage in this humorous sex education program. Moreover, Whereas
Sprinkle made a shift from porn star to artist-healer and cleverly commented
on this shift in various publications, Beatty went in the exact opposite
direction. She went underground because she wanted "to do the real thing"
and at the same time started making enough money to fund an entire film
making-process.
Beatty
became a commercial s/m sex worker, amongst other things, in order to
free herself from the strictures of government funding at a time when
right-wing America started its capitalist tirade against "taxpayer funded
homosexual pornography." Jesse Helm's proposed amendment to the Senate
of that time intended to censor "indecent" art depicting "sadomasochism,
homoeroticism, the exploitation of children and individuals engaged in
sex acts." Helm's amendment, as well as feminist accusations of s/m, reflected
a moral panic which Gayle Rubin predicted ten years earlier in her seminal
essay "Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical theory of the Politics of Sexuality"
Rubin wrote:
"It
is always risky to prophesy. But is does not take much prescience to
detect potential moral panics in two current developments: the attacks
on sadomasochists by a segment of the feminist movement, and the Right's
increasing use of AIDS to incite virulent homophobia."
Rubin
suggested that fringe sexualities be discussed outside the institutions
and discourses of feminism in order to prevent the construction of a class
of women "perverts." Nearly a decade later, in Presence and Desire:
Essays on Gender,Sexuality and Performance, Jill Dolan continues to
emphasize that a prevailing feminist anti-pornography rhetoric ultimately
censors deeply layered erotic lesbian imagery. Dolan writes: "The Jesse
Helmses of the United States aren't the only ones legislating representation
from ideologically, morally, and ethically righteous positions." A contemporary
writer, sex educator, and porn star, Carol Queen summarizes "feminisms
false analysis" of pornography in the British magazine Skin Two:
[Feminism]
has made the mistake of overestimating its area of expertise, assuming
that because it does good job in cultural and political analysis of
gender, economics, and power, it can proceed to analyse everything,
including sex ... Some women are deeply damaged by this absence of support.
Others are simply turned off by feminism. For of course most of us do
not eroticise spanking and other pervy joys out of any lack of self-worth
... How on earth can feminist (and others) imply our desire for pleasure
is a source of weakness or worse?
Although
theorists such as Gayle Rubin, Jill Dolan, Laura Kipnis, Julia Creet,
and Elizabeth Grosz, have spoken out against the marginalization of s/m;
this kind of sexuality is still predominantly viewed by feminism as one
reminiscent of the symbolic father who objectifies and humiliates women
and deprives them of a voice of resistance.
Beattys
film art is incompatible with feminism because it encapsulates the return
of "polymorphous perversity" in a new generation of female sex radicals
who are unwilling to deal with the knowledge transfer ideologies of older
generations. Beatty has felt a strong need to differentiate her work from
her mentoral "feminist" artists. When Annie Sprinkle pronounced in an
article for Spin Magazine: "I have no patience for beginners" (meaning
incipient sex workers like Maria Beatty); Sprinkle became the Symbolic
Mother who denied Beatty the right to explore her own fantasies. Both
Sprinkle and Schneemann had previously blurred the boundaries between
art, life and activism and diversified portraits of female sexuality in
the arts and pornography. According to Beatty, these artists are stuck
with the belief that the female body has to be worshipped, rather than
mutilated, and they cannot conceive of the aesthetic or ideological functions
of erotic violence.
If
the postmodern art world has been fractured over the issue of erotic violence,
is there any academic framework which can help us find continuity between
generations of women artists? First of all, let us consider the canonical
French feminist philosopher Luce Irigaray and her work Speculum of
the other Woman. Irigaray argues that assertive female sexuality has
been erased or misrepresented in the western philosophical tradition due
to its being rooted in a Platonic illusionistic "stage setup." In an evocative
reinterpretation of Platos myth of the cave, Irigaray points out
that the spectator/reader of representation has to undergo a process of
physical paralysis in order accept a de-materialized "purer" state of
mind. Thus Irigaray imagines the prisoners in Platos cave as physically and mentally immobile and unable to envision the bodily, dark space,
the womb from which they came: "Heads forward, eyes front, genitals
aligned, fixed in a straight direction and always straining forwards,
in a straight line." As for their erotic imagination, prisoners equally
submit to a transition from materiality to representation. The cave as
metaphor has emptied itself from any relation to the body, as she writes:
...
mans attributes figure only insofar as they have been made into
statues, immortalized in deathly copies. Any reference that might have
been made to it --if one could only turn around --is from the outset
a formal one. The potency of the enchanter has always already
been captured, made into a corpse by morphology.
It
is Platos narrow theatrical agenda which performance artists and
pornographers tried to overthrow in their attack on the abstract, gender-less
ideas and shapes of academic theory and aesthetics. 60s and 70 performance
artists attempted to "break the chains" of representation in order to
make a new type of ritual body art. They paraded and appropriated the
mythic functions and living properties of censored genital bodies
in experimental performance works. Schneemann in Interior Scroll (1975)
pulled a scroll out of her vagina and read aloud a text attacking a structuralist
thinker who misread her body works. In 1991, Annie Sprinkle douched on
stage in preparation of her "public cervix announcement" in which, aided
by speculum and flashlight, she allowed audience members to look at her
cervix.
Performance
arts assault on the philosopher's obsession with form and morphology,
has to be reinvestigated in light of a new generation of s/m erotica artists.
How does Beattys film art differ from performance art? How does
the chained s/m performer conceive of sexuality in comparison to "liberated"
transgressive transformation facilitators? Beatty is waging a new battle
against restrictive stage settings imposed by art or pornography, yet
she refuses to articulate the precise nature of her subversive ritual.
Whereas the more established porn star Annie Sprinkle thrives on humorous
and articulate commentaries to interrupt and enlighten happenings, Beatty
hopes to rethink social and sexual freedom within the s/m mimetic scenario
itself. Merging the body with cold technological environments, Beatty
reclaims an artistic, women-friendly space for erotic cruelty inside the
growing cultures, shapes and productions of lesbian s/m porn. Not unlike
60s and 70s performance artists, Beatty returns to a theory of bodily
instincts, yet she easily appropriates the commodified styles of mainstream
s/m and fetish pornography. Beattys porn aesthetics and tastes conflict
with coarser and confrontational feminist movements. However, her super-sensualism
is nurtured and understood by a new community of female sex workers, artists
and critics. Writers such as Pat Califia and Kathy Acker circumvent restrictive
legislation and cultivate violence on the body as a new setting for auto-ethnography
and female pleasure. In Public Sex. The Culture of Radical Sex (1995) Pat Califia offers positive definitions of masochism, and cleverly
comments on new materialist constructions of public sex in our culture.
For instance, she describes how the s/m industry has started to use rubber
and latex outfits to refine bondage fantasies. These costumes connote
sexual preference and the s/m routine of transforming new materials and
inventions for sexual fetishes: "The latex fetish is an excellent example
of the way human culture (especially technology) alters human sexuality."
Even if Califia's insights are considered to be "on the edge" of academic
criticism, even if Beatty's fetishes do not qualify as aesthetic formal
entities, both women teach us how s/m condenses aspects of female sexuality
within the realm of altered languages and technology.
|